

Generative AI has captured the imagination of business leaders everywhere, promising to revolutionize everything from customer service to product development. Yet, beneath the headlines and hype, a sobering reality is emerging: most enterprise AI pilots don’t deliver the transformation they promise. The viral “95% of Copilots fail” statistic—often misattributed to specific products like Microsoft Copilot or GitHub Copilot—is actually a reference to a recent MIT report that studied hundreds of generative AI deployments across industries.
But what does this number really mean? The MIT research reveals that the vast majority of AI pilots stall out before reaching production, not because the technology itself is fundamentally flawed, but because organizations struggle to move beyond experimentation. These failures aren’t about broken algorithms—they’re about broken strategies, misaligned expectations, and a lack of integration with real business workflows.
The divide between AI pilot failures and successes is stark. While most companies are stuck in “pilot purgatory,” a small group – just 5% – are extracting millions in value by approaching AI differently. They focus on solving specific business challenges, integrating AI into core processes, and partnering with vendors who understand their business. The lessons from these successes are clear, actionable, and urgently needed for anyone hoping to cross the GenAI Divide.
In this blog, we’ll unpack five key insights from Stuart Moriss, Hitachi Solutions Director of Research and Development, that separate the failures from the successes, each illustrated with a soundbite from our fireside chat. These insights will help you understand not just why most AI pilots flop, but what the 5% are doing right—and how you can join them.
Insight 1: Success Starts with Clean Data
One of the most overlooked reasons AI pilots fail is poor data hygiene. Stuart points out that many organizations rush into AI projects without first ensuring their data is accurate, organized, and accessible. This foundational misstep means that even the most advanced AI tools can’t deliver value if they’re fed bad inputs. Before any pilot can succeed, the groundwork must be laid.
Insight 2: ROI Isn’t Always About P&L
The viral “95% failure” headline misses a crucial nuance: not all AI projects are designed to deliver immediate financial returns. Stuart explains that many pilots drive internal improvements—like compliance or process efficiency—that don’t show up on the bottom line but are still vital to the business. Measuring success only by P&L impact ignores the broader value AI can create.
Insight 3: Back Office Wins First
While most AI budgets are spent on sales and marketing pilots, the real wins are happening behind the scenes. Stuart highlights that back-office automation—where processes are well-documented and risks are lower—delivers the highest ROI. These projects may not be flashy, but they’re where AI is quietly transforming business operations.
Insight 4: Purposeful Design Beats Generalized AI
A common mistake is expecting AI to solve every problem out of the box. Stuart Morris advocates for a targeted approach: design AI tools to retrieve and process specific data, rather than giving them access to everything. This purposeful design leads to better outcomes and avoids the pitfalls of “one-size-fits-all” solutions.
Insight 5: Repeatable IP Drives Real Value
The organizations that cross the GenAI Divide aren’t just experimenting—they’re building repeatable, workflow-integrated solutions. Stuart Morris shares how tools developed for specific business needs, like RFP response automation, can be reused and scaled across teams. This approach turns pilots into lasting assets.
Despite sobering statistics, Stuart remains optimistic. His advice? Focus on targeted solutions, clean data, and repeatable success. With the right strategy, generative AI can be a powerful ally—not just a flashy experiment.
We’d love to hear from you to keep this conversation going. Please reach out to use by clicking here.